Nuclear Socialism Strikes Again

The nuclear industry is all atwitter (in the ancient sense of the word) at the possibility that an American utility may soon receive permission to build the first new nuclear plants in more than 30 years.

These plants may get built, but their construction is not a sign of a real “nuclear renaissance.” Private investors remain as uninterested in investing in nuclear power as they have been for decades, frightened away by the massive cost overruns that caused them to stop funding new nuclear plants in the late 1970s, well before the accident at Three Mile Island . (It’s all too common for nuclear promoters to cite TMI as the cause of the collapse of the nuclear industry. But the collapse was already well underway before the accident. For the industry, pointing to the accident as the turning point is actually a way for the industry to hide the economic collapse that soaring construction costs had already caused.)

So why is the giant utility Southern Company preparing to build two more plants (Vogtle 3 and Vogtle 4) next to two operating nuclear plants, Vogtle 1 and Vogtle 2? (The dangers of clustering nuclear plants closely together is one of the lessons from last year’s meltdowns at Fukushima that the American nuclear industry and its regulators are ignoring. Communities with existing nuclear plants are much less resistant to the construction of additional plants, making siting a much easier process than building on a new site.)

The answer to Southern Co.’s decision is simple: $8.3 billion in taxpayer money, in the form of federal loan guarantees created through the Energy Policy Act of 2005. These loan guarantees are only the latest form of nuclear socialism.

To read more about the nuclear industry’s failure to wean itself from federal subsidies for more than 60 years, check out these two excerpts from Nukespeak’s Chapter 23, “The Industry That Couldn’t Learn,” which are available on the Alternet news site and in the latest issue of the Canadian online journal Coldtype.


About these ads
This entry was posted in There Isn't Any Choice and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

10 Responses to Nuclear Socialism Strikes Again

  1. Michael Ingram says:

    Actually, less than half of the investment in the new Vogtle units are Southern (Georgia Power). There are three other investors: Oglethorpe, MEAG, and Dalton Utilities. The DOE loan is shared among all four investors, proportionally. Did I mention the DOE share was a loan? Total estimated cost of the project is $14B. Plenty of skin for the four companies (Southen is publically traded company), including the LOAN from the DOE.

  2. Pingback: 573 deaths ‘related to nuclear crisis’ | The GOLDEN RULE

  3. This paragraph provides clear idea designed for the new people of
    blogging, that actually how to do running a blog.

  4. Thanks for sharing yokur thoughts about attorney billing software.


  5. I was curious if you ever thought of changing the structure of your site?
    Its very well written; I love what youve got to say.
    But maybe you could a little more in the way of content so people
    could connect with it better. Youve got an awful lot of
    text for only having 1 or two pictures. Maybe you could
    space it out better?

  6. Hi! This is my first visit to your blog! We are a
    team of volunteers and starting a new initiative in a community in thhe same niche.
    Yourr blog provided us useful information to work on.
    Youu hav done a marvellous job!

  7. Rusty says:

    What’s up, just wanted to tell you, I liked this
    blog post. It was helpful. Keep on posting!

  8. Angeline says:

    Howdy, i read your blog from time to time and i own a similar one and i was just
    curious if you get a lot of spam remarks? If so how do you protect against it,
    any plugin or anything you can suggest? I get so much lately it’s driving me insane so any assistance is very much appreciated.

  9. Aaron says:

    If you are going for best contents like myself, simply go to see this website
    daily since it gives feature contents, thanks

  10. I believe what you said was very reasonable. But, think about this,
    suppose you were to create a killer headline?
    I ain’t suggesting your information is not solid,
    but suppose you added a title to maybe grab a person’s attention?
    I mean Nuclear Socialism Strikes Again | Nukespeak is
    a little plain. You ought to glance at Yahoo’s front page and
    watch how they create post headlines to grab people to click.
    You might try adding a video or a pic or two to grab readers excited
    about everything’ve written. In my opinion, it could bring your blog a little

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s